This ruling is going to be a real mixed bag, either way it goes. This guy who filed the suit (Chicago/gun ban) is basically saying he is a sitting duck inside his home when the criminals know he doesn't have a gun in there. (I guess more people know that now).
From redstate.com,
Posted by Ben Domenech
Tuesday, June 15th at 5:08PM EDT
We’ve been talking a lot about the NRA today, and that brings to mind this video from my colleague at the Heartland Institute, Zach Christenson, posted over at Freedom Pub. Watch the whole thing, but particularly the part with Otis MacDonald, the man behind the Chicago gun case, explaining why he needs to own a gun:
