The Richardson Coalition is responsible for trashing a lot of people, that has caused a lot of backlash, and this is a large group looking at the list of its members and the list of "under the radar" members (like one of their prior web technicians, if he in fact has stopped doing it, who thought Gary did something for him but he was actually promoted by others, who he then attacks on Gary's behalf).
(Just like the guy doing bidding, who thought he was kept off of something, but he is blaming the wrong people).
If what people are saying is accurate, expect a lot more backlash and listing of the names of The Women of The Richardson Coalition. I read some of their names on a local Richardson blog too.
Several whisper about "it's too bad about the collateral damage, but it wasn't me" or "I disagree with what they did to some people, but it's over and done with."
Why did those ladies trash some people who had helped them? It's right there in black and white on the Coalition web site, the names of the ladies are right there (not all of them, but most), and the mailer and trash they endorsed is right there. They endorsed the mailer and behavior. (Now they are helping lend their prestige to crafty email harvesting.) If she didn't, why is her name there. If she didn't why didn't she disavow it. At least she could have asked for her name to be removed, as someone else has requested. She goes around saying, "It wasn't me, so my name should not be on the list" but she doesn't say anything to Gary and Chuck and Stan and C dude or A dude or the five founders or whoever runs the site.
Was trashing good (and bad) people really worth it? Did the business sent your way make the necklace shine more? Was the safari trip to Africa sweeter?
If you did not trash good people and your name was misused, then why aren't you saying anything? No, you didn't just disagree with them, you trashed some of them. You helped caused this backlash.
You know the things you said about those ladies, how would you like it if they started saying things about you (true things, which is less harrassing than what you did)?
Why is it ok for The Women of The Richardson Coalition to trash people and not for people to trash them? Why can they trash two of my friends with lies and innuendos and expect me to be ok with it?
Richardson has a double standard. The Women Of The Richardson Coalition can trash, no matter the reason, including other ladies, but don't anyone dare trash them, after all, they are just women.
Her name is on the list, endorsing the trashing. If it is not true, then the Richardson Coalition needs to stop misleading all of Richardson by using people's names without their permission. The people's names who are being misused should be concerned that they are being listed on the trash list if they really had nothing to do with it.
The re-election committee of someone includes a lady that goes around saying that she wasn't a part of it and she has even apologized, but she is still listed. (She has plans). Her prestige is given to the trashing, including of someone she claims is her friend.
They just shrug and say it is collateral damage.
I have started hearing and seeing the names of the Women Of The Coalition and I can only believe that some of them don't deserve to be associated with it, but they do need to get their names off the list if they are not responsible for the trashing and lies and innuendos because they are going to be part of the backlash campaign against The Richardson Coalition and what it did, what the women listed did.
People accuse The Richardson Coalition of being sexist. Darn right they are, but not entirely in only the way we all might be conditioned to think. The Women Of The Richardson Coalition (most of the names are on the web site or Gary Slagel's re-election web site) are as much or more to blame than the "men." The men couldn't have done it so well without you ladies.
I never heard anyone trash The Women Of The Richardson Coalition at all in public, until after they started doing it in public. It wasn't just disagreement they dished out, it was trash. So that's why the trash in return, ladies. You have been given a pass. At least until now because I am starting to see your names being listed as the trashers.
I would like to thank The Richardson Coalition, especially The Women of The Richardson Coalition for "protecting our quality of life" as they claim they are. If they are not, then they don't need to claim they are. I don't hear anyone claiming that except people who seem to "not be protecting our quality of life" like The Women Of The Richardson Coalition have not been protecting our quality of life.
At least one of them has newly moved herself into one of the most respected groups in Richardson, but has become the Membership chair with access to the database and people's check information (banking, driver's license numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, etc) including people she has helped trash.
