Wednesday, September 15, 2010

I communicated strongly with "representation" about the pitiful proposed ethics policy. Funny they saw how many had concern with it,


more than a misspelled word, and more than a couple of worms finally started turning. Why should it have come to that, to that extent? I won't get into the original lame answer I was given. Astonishing. Staff should not say they put the six months limitation idea in there or the "confidential" clause either.