Showing posts with label they were against being against it before being for being against it. Show all posts
Showing posts with label they were against being against it before being for being against it. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

I communicated strongly with "representation" about the pitiful proposed ethics policy. Funny they saw how many had concern with it,


more than a misspelled word, and more than a couple of worms finally started turning. Why should it have come to that, to that extent? I won't get into the original lame answer I was given. Astonishing. Staff should not say they put the six months limitation idea in there or the "confidential" clause either.